ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vaccination with ChAdOx1 n-CoV-19 is associated with a rare syndrome called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). VITT has been reported mainly in Western countries, whereas the report of VITT in Asians is sparse. OBJECTIVES: To report a case series of VITT following ChAdOx1 n-CoV-19 in Thailand and to estimate the incidence of VITT among Asian countries. METHODS: We retrieved the number of VITT patients and the total inoculation doses from the database of the Thai Ministry of Public Health. We performed a literature search including published articles and gray literature to estimate the incidence of VITT. The incidences of VITT by countries and respective confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: By the end of August 2021, five VITT cases occurred after 15 million doses of ChAdOx1 n-CoV-19 in Thailand. The median age was 31 years, and 60% were women. The incidence of VITT is estimated at 1 in 3 million. In other Asian countries, only a few cases of VITT have been reported. The incidence of VITT is much lower than in those of Western countries, which is estimated at 1 in 100, 000. The fatality rate was 44% in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of VITT in Asians is low, the mortality rate is substantially higher. We urge that public awareness of this syndrome be raised, as early recognition and appropriate treatment of this syndrome following ChAdOx1 n-CoV-19 are crucial to improve the outcome.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been reported after vaccination with the adenoviral vector coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in European countries. To date, two cases of VITT have been reported in Thais after COVID-19 vaccination. We determined the frequency of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanionic antibodies in the Thai population receiving the COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the prevalence of anti-PF4/polyanionic antibodies in health care workers who received COVID-19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or CoronaVac within 7 to 35 days. A control population who had not been vaccinated was also included. Anti-PF4/polyanionic antibodies were detected using ELISA. Functional assay with platelet aggregation was performed for all positive anti-PF4/polyanionic antibody ELISA tests. RESULTS: A total of 646 participants were included in the study; 221 received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 232 received CoronaVac, and 193 participants were in the control group. The prevalence of anti-PF4 antibodies was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-5.2), 1.7% (95% CI, 0.5-4.4) in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and CoronaVac groups, respectively. There was no positive test in the control group. None of the PF4/polyanionic positive sera induced platelet aggregation. CONCLUSION: We found a low prevalence of anti-PF4 antibodies in Thais after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and CoronaVac. None of the antibodies were functional and lacked an association with VITT.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the incidence of thromboembolism has been increasingly reported. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolism among COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Scopus, and grey literature were searched until June 2020. Observational studies reported on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) were included. The pool incidences and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were included. In the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, the pooled incidence of VTE was 28% (95% CI, 22-34%). Subgroups based on compression ultrasound (CUS) screening revealed a higher incidence of DVT in the CUS screening group than in the no CUS screening group (32% [95% CI, 18-45%] vs. 6% [95% CI, 4-9%]). The pooled incidence of ATE in ICU was 3% (95% CI, 2-5%). In the non-ICU setting, the pooled incidence of VTE was 10% (95% CI, 6-14%,). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VTE in COVID-19 patients was higher in the ICU setting than in the non-ICU setting, and also significantly higher in studies that incorporated the CUS screening protocol. The incidence of ATE in the ICU setting was low. VTE prophylactic measures should be given to all hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19.